Scenerio Planning

Make “What If” decisions before reality forces them — quantify trade-offs, align actions, and reduce surprises.

Forecasts are not enough when constraints, promotions, lead times, and capacity limits shift fast. Scenario planning creates a controlled way to test alternatives — and choose the best path based on service, cash, and cost. I help teams build scenarios that are simple enough to run weekly, yet robust enough to support real decisions.

What It Covers

Three scenario types that drive decisions

Scenarios should be comparable, measurable, and tied to actions — not endless analysis. These three cover most real-world cases.

1) Demand Shock Scenarios

  • Promo uplift vs. baseline
  • Price changes and elasticity assumptions
  • Channel shifts (eComm vs retail, key accounts)
  • New product launch ramp / phase-out
✅ Decide early: allocate supply, adjust inventory, protect service on priority items.

2) Supply Constraint Scenarios

  • Lead time increases and variability
  • Supplier shortages / MOQ constraints
  • Capacity caps (production, packing, DC throughput)
  • Transport disruptions and mode switches
✅ Decide early: rationing rules, substitutions, expediting vs. service impact.

3) Policy & Trade-off Scenarios

  • Service level targets by segment
  • Inventory policy changes (safety stock, reorder points)
  • Cash focus vs. service focus
  • Cost-to-serve changes (picking, freight, returns)
✅ Decide early: align on the “right” trade-off using shared metrics.
How It Works

A lightweight cadence you can run repeatedly

Scenario planning only works if it’s repeatable. This structure keeps it fast, consistent, and decision-oriented.

1

Set the baseline

Lock the latest demand + supply plan as the reference point (and version it).

2

Define 2–5 scenarios

Keep them mutually exclusive and comparable (same horizon, same KPI set).

3

Apply levers

Demand: uplift, price, mix. Supply: lead time, capacity, allocations, expediting.

4

Quantify impact

Service risk, inventory delta, cash, cost, and operational feasibility.

5

Compare and choose

Make trade-offs explicit: Service–Cash–Cost, plus constraints and risks.

6

Convert to actions

Decision log: owner, due date, expected KPI effect, and follow-up review.

Deliverables & Use Cases

What you get (and where it helps most)

Designed to work with your current tools (Excel, ERP extracts, BI dashboards, APS/IBP where available) — without heavy implementation.

Typical deliverables

  • Scenario template (baseline + 2–5 scenarios with standard inputs)
  • Trade-off dashboard (service, cash, cost, capacity, inventory deltas)
  • Sensitivity view (what changes the outcome most)
  • Scenario playbook (levers, guardrails, escalation rules)
  • Decision log (chosen scenario + actions + owners + due dates)

Common “What If” questions

  • What if demand increases 20% next month?
  • What if supplier lead time increases by 2 weeks?
  • What if we prioritize service for top customers only?
  • What if we switch transport modes to protect service?
  • What if we reduce inventory to hit cash targets?
  • What if we cap promotions due to capacity constraints?
Outcomes

What improves when scenarios are standard

Scenarios reduce reactive work and accelerate alignment — because stakeholders see the same impacts and trade-offs.

✅ Faster decision-making under uncertainty
✅ Clear trade-offs (service / cash / cost)
✅ Reduced expediting and firefighting
✅ Better allocation & prioritization rules
✅ More reliable supply plans

Need practical scenario planning that drives action?

If planning meetings are stuck in “opinions vs opinions,” scenario planning creates a measurable way to choose. I can set up the templates, cadence, and decision process — then hand it over as a repeatable operating rhythm.

Amsterdam, NL EMEA Interim support